Bell: ‘We’ll keep running Iglesias out there’


CINCINNATI — The vast and overwhelming majority of Cincinnati Reds Nation wanted Raisel Iglesias placed on a slow boat to Bora Bora or a fast space shuttle through the Aurora Borealis.

Put him anywhere on Mother Earth except on a pitching mound with a baseball in his hand while wearing a Cincinnati Reds uniform.

That’s what happens to a relief pitcher, a so-called closer, when he loses 11 games. While most fans believe that a relief pitcher losing 11 games in one season is a mortal sin, it happens. And it happens to the best.

Remember Los Angeles Dodgers relief pitcher Mike Marshall, the kinesiology guru? He appeared in 106 games for the 1974 Dodgers and won 15 games. The next season he lost 14.

The all-time record for bullpen losses is owned by Atlanta’s Gene Garber. Remember him? He is the pitcher who struck out Pete Rose to end Rose’s 44-game hitting streak and Rose complained, “He pitched me like it was Game Seven of the World Series.”

In 1979 Garber lost 16 games out of the bullpen for the Braves. In 1970, Darold Knowles was 2-and-14 out of the Washington Senators bullpen.

It isn’t even unprecented with the Reds. J.J. Hoover was 1-and-10 in 2014. Tom Hume lost 10 out of the bullpen in 1980, earning him a much-despised nickname, Boom-Boom Hume. Cool Billy McCool lost 10 out of the Reds bullpen in 1965.

As they say, everybody loves company and Iglesias hasn’t had much of it in his corner lately.

But he has sone. And it is the one that counts, his manager, David Bell. It took Bell either strong intestinal fortitude or a death wish for him to point Iglesias to the mound in the ninth inning of the second game of Sunday’s doubleheader in St Louis.

Just days earlier, he gave up walk-off game-winning home run in Miami to the only batter he faced. On Saturday in St. Louis, asked to protect a 2-1 lead, he didn’t retire anybody. He gave up two runs , two hits and hit a batter and the Reds lost 3-2.

Now there he was again, on the mound Sunday night, asked to preserve a 5-3 lead. He went 3-and-0 on the first hitter and there was one large-volume, “Oh, no. Not again,” chant throughout Redsland.

As one fan on Facebook asked, “Has Bell completely lost his marbles.”

Iglesias recovered from the 3-and-0 count to not only strike out Tommy Edman, but he struck out the side.

“He went 3-and-0 and then just locked it in,” said Bell. “I was so happy for him. He has pitched really well in save situations, he really has.”

For his career, Iglesias is 92 saves in 105 chances, an 88 per cent conversion rate. He has 28 saves this season, fifth Reds pitcher to record 28 or more saves in three straight seasons.

Save situations aren’t the big problem. And Bell knows it. It is the non-save situations, tie games and when the reds are behind one or two runs late in a game. Those are problems.

“We’ll keep helping him and supporting him,” said Bell. “In the end, they do have to do it on their own. That’s what made me so happy for what he did Sunday. He is out there by himself on the mound and he figured it out. That was a great step for him.”

What is so quizzical and shoulder-shrugging is that even though Iglesias has lost 11 games, his strikeouts-to-walks ratio is better than in the past. Most of his numbers, other than losses, are as good as or better than the last few years. They were eye-popping enough for the Reds to sign him after last season to a three-year $24.125 million deal.

“The saves are there,” said Bell. “I know, it’s the losses. We still believe in him. He is a good pitcher and we need him. He is going to keep getting opportunities.”

That isn’t a vote of confidence, that’s a landslide election for a guy who has struggled mightily.

“For me, he is a guy we want to get the ball to when we have a lead,” said Bell. “We have a few guys like that. He has shown a willingness to pitch in any inning.”

Some questioned that willingness earlier this season when Iglesias said he was being used wrong, that he should only be used for one inning in save situations. That was brusque and brash talk for a young pitcher.

“The fact is, though, that he has been much better in save situations,” said Bell. “He has been so much better and that IS a factor for me.”

Bell realizes that managing a baseball teams is part psychologist, part psychiatrist and part counsellor, in addition to running a baseball game.

“We’re trying to win games and to do that I try to put guys in the best position to succeed,” he said. “I might see a better spot for Iglesias in the eighth, he has pitched better in save situations. I’m trying to balance that out.

“The best part of my job is trying to deal with people,” he added. “They’re humans. I’m trying to balance that with the best way to win games. Nothing is more important than that and that’s what made me so happy for Iglesias Sunday.”

Just as a couple of bad days doesn’t wreck a season, one outstanding day doesn’t resurrect it. Iglesias, as are all pitchers, is only as good (or bad) as his next climb up the pitcher’s mound.

4 thoughts on “Bell: ‘We’ll keep running Iglesias out there’”

  1. Hal, this is what happens when your manager cares more about being viewed as a “player’s coach” than winning! He did the same thing with David Hernandez and Jared Hughes. They’d both still be here losing games if the front office hadn’t intervened. All told Captain Dumbass has probably cost his team about ten wins. And factoring in how he didn’t get his starters nearly enough at bats in spring training, thereby guaranteeing their slow hitting start, it’s probably closer to fifteen. But even if it’s only ten games, instead of their record being 64-73 it could have been 74-63 and they’d be in first place by 1/2 game over St. Louis and Chicago.

  2. I’m remembering lefty Jim Merritt too. 20-game winner in 1970 to losing 18 or 19 in the horrible ’71 season. Thinking he finally won a game from the bullpen that year and the win may have prevented what would have been a Reds consecutive loss record.

    Felt really sorry for him.

    Poor Sparky in the ’70 series. A flock of sore arm pitchers unable to help the team v. Baltimore with that great pitching staff and bullpen they had !

  3. When you have a 3 year contract, you can do what you want. Mr. Bell, will in my opionion be gone before this team sniffs 3rd place. ACCOUNTABILITY has never been a factor since 2014! The team starts spring training with the thoughts” we are not expected to win so just show up” get paid as fans dont deserve a winner mentality. Whatever happens happens. Time for Bob to sellto somebofdy more committed to fixing this teams run of not even sniffing the playoffs. WINNING SELLS TICKETS, losing doesnt! Our ball park is Wrigley South and Busch South. Reds fans deserve a winner. Not only allowed to view the past at the museum!!

  4. Winning baseball v. entertainment baseball. Two different business models in todays game.

    The old adage about putting the best team on the field…all managers say it however in reality the big dollar contracts play every day when their production declines. Thus the dilemma of keeping Joey Votto near the top of the batting order next year at age 37.

    Call third strikes, walks or RBI’s ?

    If the Reds obtain another outfield RBI bat I’m interested to see what they do. Hopefully Votto can bounce back with some runs batted in. However if the last 3-years in any indication I’m doubtful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *